Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elijah Poritzky vs William Grant Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Poritzky vs Grant analysis and find out who is favored!
Elijah Poritzky vs William Grant Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Poritzky 0 - 0 Grant
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Poritzky has won 42.86% of points on their second serve, while Grant has won 49.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Poritzky, in recent form, has won 61.45% of their opponent's second serve points, while Grant has won 51.97%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.99% and 36.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Poritzky has saved 62.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Grant has saved 55.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Poritzky has won 50% of matches played (W/L 7/ 7), with Grant winning 63.33% (W/L 38/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Poritzky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10). Grant has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 11/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 39/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Poritzky has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 7/ 7), where as Grant has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 36/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Poritzky has played against opponents with an average rank of 38.57 while Grant has played against players with an average rank of 157.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Poritzky has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Grant has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Poritzky has converted 55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Grant has converted 46.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
687
Rank
687
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
43% (27-36)
Career Total W/L
55% (73-59)
67% (6-3)
YTD W/L
65% (22-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elijah Poritzky | William Grant |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (6/3) | 65% (22/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 59% (46/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (91/70) | 54% (388/325) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 67% (10/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 63% (10/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 10 | 119 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 18 | 83 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:30:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 60 | 180.68 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (171/255) | 59% (1158/1962) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (111/171) | 67% (772/1158) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (36/84) | 49% (395/804) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (11/20) | 47% (100/214) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (91/221) | 42% (837/1979) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (6/3) | 65% (20/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (6/9) | 65% (22/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 80% (8/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 95% (19/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 5% (19/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 27% (15/4) |
Elijah Poritzky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Sora Fukuda
Player
Elijah Poritzky
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elijah Poritzky
Player
Kento Tagashira
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
19 of
22)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
2 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Axel Nefve
Player
Elijah Poritzky
44%
(
18 of
41)
1st Serve %
77%
(
46 of
60)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elijah Poritzky
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
2
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
view more
William Grant Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
William Grant
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
43%
(
24 of
56)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Corey Craig
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Nicaise Muamba
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
William Grant
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
108)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
48 of
77)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
101
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cooper Woestendick
Player
William Grant
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Maxwell Benson
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
5
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
William Grant
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
7
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Chad Kissell
58%
(
72 of
124)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Poritzky Vs Grant Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Poritzky are available here and Grant photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
